Longitudinal record
This patient, across visits
- Constitution (Prakriti) · Transformation / Structure
- Digestion (Agni) · variable after travel
- Last food plan (Pathya) · warm, bitter, no daytime sleep
- 4 prior visits on this complaint
For Ayurveda physicians
AyurDoc turns the consult into a structured assessment and food-and-routine notes in plain English. You edit, sign, and write any treatment. Chart stays the medical record.
Practitioner-only. First 3 months on us. No card. $199 a month after that.
Most clinical software was built around conventional medicine. Practitioners end up adapting generic forms, writing the same information twice, bolting on a scribe, or forcing Ayurvedic reasoning into a system that cannot hold it.
AyurDoc is the clinical layer for that consult: constitution and digestion notes, a five-part assessment in English, food and routine drafts, and follow-up. You stay the clinician. The model does not prescribe.
The encounter
Before
Constitution (Prakriti), the current imbalance (Vikriti), digestion (Agni), pulse (Nadi), symptoms, treatment history, and earlier visits are already on the record. Intake is part of the visit, not a form you interpret later.
Longitudinal record

During
Live transcription captures the consult. The copilot organizes it into Ayurvedic structure, surfaces prior findings, and suggests the next question. You examine the patient. AyurDoc handles the documentation around you.
After
Review the draft assessment and food plan, correct them, and sign. You write any treatment. Reports and follow-up come from the same encounter, so you are not rebuilding the visit from memory at the end of the day.
Review, edit, and sign
The system
Patient timeline
Live consultation
Assessment
Clinical copilot
Food and routine
Chart sync
Causes, early signs, what you see, what helps or worsens, and how it developed. Sanskrit names stay secondary so Western-trained staff can follow the note.
Symptoms, digestion notes, constitution pattern, and prior food guidance stay linked. The next consult opens on the delta, not a blank page.
The copilot reads this encounter against prior visits. It surfaces gaps and follow-up questions. You stay responsible for the clinical decision.
Record or type the visit, see the transcript, and draft the note in one workspace while you stay with the patient.
AyurDoc drafts diet and daily-routine guidance for you to edit. You write any treatment. AyurDoc does not fill prescriptions.
AI drafts. You review, edit, and sign. Nothing is submitted for you.
Architecture
AyurDoc does not need to become a second copy of your EHR. Chart (OpenEMR) remains the system of record. AyurDoc connects through a patient identifier and runs the Ayurvedic workflow around that patient.
OpenEMR, Chart
Patient ID
Link the record. Do not copy it.
AyurDoc
PHI identity stays in the EHR. AyurDoc operates as the connected Ayurvedic layer, with the practitioner reviewing every clinical output.
Launch from the patient workflow. Keep the relationship through linked IDs. Export reports back to Chart Documents.
Practitioner-only. Continuity, access controls, structured clinical data, and a clear boundary around protected health information.
Category
| Generic AI scribe | General EMR | AyurDoc | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live transcription | Yes | Limited | Yes |
| Ayurvedic intake | No | No | Yes |
| English-first visit assessment | No | No | Yes |
| Ayurvedic longitudinal record | No | No | Yes |
| Clinical copilot | Generic | No | Ayurveda-specific |
| Food and routine drafts | No | Generic | Yes |
| EHR-connected workflow | Varies | Native | Yes |
| Built for Ayurvedic practitioners | No | No | Yes |
The clinical model starts with Ayurveda. Full comparison
One patient. One clinical history. One Ayurvedic system. No searching old PDFs. No rebuilding the case from memory.
First 3 months on us. No card. Same login for AyurDoc and Chart. $199 a month after that.
FAQ